Clara Nevins
Feb 8, 2017

President Trump's first environmental action


Today the president green lighted the Dakota Access Pipeline. The pipeline will run through the Standing Rock tribe's water supply...the land will become inhabitable. This angers me because activists worked for months in order to stop the construction of the pipeline--and we thought we had won the fight. I worry that this will be the first of many actions that the president will take against the environment, and in favor of oil and business.

Rachna Shah
Feb 8, 2017

I completely agree with you. After months of protests, the pipeline construction was finally ordered to be halted. Suddenly, Trump reverses this - as though these efforts were all in vain. He's not listening to the voices of millions of people. Trump recently tweeted out that he doesn't view this policy as "controversial", further reinforcing that message.

Carolina Ranfagni
Apr 22, 2017

I´m not from the US and even I have an idea of the consequences that the pipeline will have. It is very sad to see that even though people protested and environmental consequences are clear, the pipelines will be constructed.

Rachna Shah
Apr 23, 2017

It further angers me that this doesn't even go along with his business-oriented 'America First' policy. Despite the memorandum published by the White House stating the steel companies should only be using American Steel, it doesn't force them to do so, and it isn't likely that the pipeline will be built with American steel. It surprises and saddens me that the debate about this project has quieted.

New Posts
  • Manasa Pradhan
    Jul 5, 2018

    Development happens and it happens fast; without a care of natural resources which usually cause environmental destruction. Therefore building and operating of infrastructures in ways that do not not disturb the ecological processes are required to maintain the functionality of natural systems.
  • Archana Reddy
    Apr 22, 2018

    Pacific islanders are facing the brunt of climate change impacts by which many left their native lands behind . People living in low-lying island nations have done almost nothing to cause climate change but are already facing rising sea levels and extreme weather affecting them frequently in a year . It is not only a Pacific issue but a global issue. All countries will be affected by people on the move in relation to climate change. To what i have observed is that several international conferences are held each year to discuss on such issues but not much done . open for discussions / suggestions/ inputs ...?
  • annadomahidi
    Feb 21, 2018

    I think I audibly gasped when I read the CNN update a week or so ago that discussed the severity of Cape Town's water drought and needing to close all taps in the city eventually in what would be known as 'Day Zero.' This personally sounds terrifying, and I cannot even begin to imagine what that would be like. However, I read another CNN update today (which gave me the idea for this post) that stated that Day Zero was just pushed to July due to major water conservation efforts by the people in Cape Town and surrounding areas. That's great news! It's reassuring to see that taking unified action, especially for such a sustainable goal, can have such important impacts (not that they normally don't equal something important, but this is a really great example and it happened pretty quickly). However, it makes me think-- does it have to take something as drastic as facing a day zero in order to make changes in how we interact with the environment and our daily routines?