• About Us

  • Mismatch

  • Discussions

  • Opinions

  • Ambassadors

  • Conference

  • More

    Bridge the Divide

    • Facebook Social Icon
    • Instagram Social Icon
    • YouTube Social  Icon
    • btdivide
    • Twitter Social Icon
    • LinkedIn Social Icon
    • About Us

    • Mismatch

    • Discussions

    • Opinions

    • Ambassadors

    • Conference

    • More

      1. Discussions
      2. Healthcare
      3. 'National Emergency' Label Rejected
      Search
      Rachna Shah
      Aug 9, 2017

      'National Emergency' Label Rejected

      0 comments

      Edited: Aug 9, 2017

      President Trump recently decided not to declare the opioid epidemic as a national emergency (as under the Stafford Act). His decision has gained support from across the aisle, as many individuals believe that declaring a national emergency would do little to combat the underlying causes of the crisis, such as fighting the stigma that surrounds the recovery process as well as expanding alternative treatments (e.g. physical therapy). What are your thoughts and reactions to President Trump's decision as well as the decision of the four states? Do you view the opioid epidemic as a national emergency? Why or why not?

       

      Sources to read:

      - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-health-202/2017/08/09/the-health-202-trump-doesn-t-need-to-declare-the-opioid-crisis-a-national-emergency/5989eb7530fb045fdaef11bf/

      - http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/08/secretary-price-and-counselor-conway-address-opioid-crisis-live-blog.html

      - https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/08/us/politics/trump-opioid-crisis.html

       

      0
      New Posts
      • Levi Cannon
        May 6

        Could single payer work in the US?

        Single-payer national health insurance is a health care system is which a single public agency organizes health care financing, but the delivery of health care would remain in private hands. Currently, the US spends $10,348 per person, which is by far the most in the world (second is Switzerland with $7,919 person.) However, the US has by no means the best health care in the would. The WHO ranks the US as the 37th best healthcare system in the world, and millions of Americans are still uninsured. Single payer countires rank highly on the list, and bringing single payer to the US would help push the number of uninsured Americans to zero. Bernie Sanders intoduced his "Medicare For All" bill to the Senate Finance Committee last year, and current bipartisan calculations estimate this healthcare system to cost the goverment $32 trillion over 10 years. https://www.mercatus.org/publications/federal-fiscal-policy/costs-national-single-payer-healthcare-system and https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/what-would-it-take-make-single-payer-health-care-reality Currently, 49% of Americans support single payer, and its popularity is rising. Could single-payer be implemented in the US, or is it too much of a challenge? Also, what systems could work better or be more feasible in the US?
        1 comment
        0
      • asaperstein1
        Jul 11, 2018

        Social determinants of health

        How do you think racism and poverty play into poor health? Do you think there is a way we could make the world more healthy without simply providng more healthcare, but instead by addressing some of the causes of poor health among the poor?
        0 comments
        0
      • Lucy
        Nov 22, 2018

        When Euthanasia becomes a blessing to the health system

        One of Australia's states recently legalised voluntary euthanasia. The campaign for euthanasia was centered around the right to die with dignity and the ability to choose ones time, but what was not discussed was the pressure it would take of the healthcare system. All Australians are a member of Medicare and receive free healthcare for their entire lives. This means that the ageing population will put significant stress on the health system, as in 2013-14 persons over 65 accounted for 41% of same day hospitalisations and 39% of overnight hospitalisations. Thats not including the elderly who spend months at a time in hospital for serious treatments. Although there are many moral issues that surround euthanasia, an increase in the mortality rate of terminally ill elders may benefit Australia's health system, as awful as the idea is.
        1 comment
        1