enriquejsancheguiguren
Jun 26, 2017

Immigration as a moral issue

0 comments

Colin Jost had a great joke on SNL a while back about how we tend to see America as a ride that only we can ride, and the second anyone else wants to get on it, we want to shut it down. I do think there's a lot to be said on how we somehow believe that just because our (collectively, not you and me necessarily) ancestors came here at a time when it was easier to immigrate, that means that we have a say then telling people who try to immigrate in a time of increased difficulty is weird. But my main focus here is that immigration is a deeply moral issue, one at the heart of America.

First of all, it is way too difficult for normal people to get here, either in the normal legal process and as a refugee. This American Life and a number of other programs have done great pieces on how legitimately difficult it is to get to this country legally, even if you're a refugee or someone who has directly helped our army (like translators). The process is arduous, and especially in the case of refugees or people who are in danger, that process can simply be too long. This is not really something that's up for debate, as people on both sides of the political spectrum have acknowledged this, though it's odd that in spite of that acknowledgement, little has been done.

The fact of the matter is, America has always prided itself on being a nation of immigrants, and we've always treated immigrants pretty shittily. Immigrants are good for us economically, culturally, and morally, and that applies for both legal and illegal immigrants. So there's always been this conflict between wanting to accept our shared heritage of immigration, while constantly also trying to argue against immigrants and put unfair doubt upon them.

This means that we, as a people, have to decide whether or not we want to be a moral nation, that is dedicated to taking in those who, if we were in their shoes, we'd absolutely want to be let in as an act of kindness and humanity. We need to make a decision to live by the ideals written under the Statue of Liberty, or we need to choose to simply decide we aren't that nation. My problem doesn't necessarily lie in the fact our attitude to immigrants is disgusting, but it's the two faced way we both treat them as our backbone while spurning them whenever anything goes wrong in this country.

Regardless of the legality of the immigrant, when we let in someone who is genuinely seeking a better life in our country, we are standing by our message, and we are acting upon our best traits as humans: sympathy, empathy, and compassion. We can choose as a nation to stick by those ideals, or we can choose to knowingly let those people suffer in the hopes that we may somehow prevent economic competition (which we in America are supposed to like) or terrorism (even though, if we're being honest with ourselves, most terrorists are homegrown, and they tend to be white people acting negatively towards those various immigrant groups or other minorities) in spite of the fact that by and large, terrorism kills less people than most things.

That's why immigration is important to me, not for its profound economic and cultural benefits, but because it is a battle that defines our nation. We cannot continue to say one thing while doing another, and while I may not like the choice we make, we must make a choice. And if we do decide we want to live in fear of our greatest asset, how about we send Lady Liberty back to France with a lightly used sign on it.

 

New Posts
  • Felicity Wong
    Oct 24, 2018

    A large migrant caravan was recently reported to have been traveling from Honduras, passing through several Central American countries (ex. Nicaragua) in order to reach the US border. This has raised a lot of controversy especially in light of the Trump Administration's agenda on immigration. Should the US turn these people around, or open up their borders to them? Why? What does this say about the United State's immigration policy? Is there anything in the system that needs to be changed, or do you think it's working right now? Source: https://www.vox.com/2018/10/24/18010340/caravan-trump-border-honduras-mexico
  • Alan Gao
    Jun 17, 2018

    I was reading this really interesting article today: https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/06/1012312 It's about remittances, or the money that immigrants send back to their families in other countries. I was very surprised at the prevalence of this form of cash transfer. Almost one in seven people in the world are affected by them! What's more is the effect that remittances can have on a society and economy beyond just a "lifeline" (as stated in the article). These cash transfers can spur development and promote sustainability in far off, rural areas. When considering how we can achieve the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals, remittances are an important source of development funds that cannot go overlooked.
  • Alan Gao
    Jun 17, 2018

    Sometimes we hold misguided beliefs about the world around us due to lapses in judgement. Most people aren't to blame for this because they aren't aware of certain neurological lapses known as cognitive biases. Recently, there has been a lot of anti-immigration rhetoric all around the world that cites terrorist threats as a main selling point. It's easy to fall for this rhetoric because of a cognitive bias known as the availability heuristic. Essentially, our brains tend to take the most recent piece of information about a certain topic and believe that it is the most important regarding to the topic at hand. When observing terrorist attacks on the news, our brains tend to over inflate the prevalence of such events around the world. Once politicians or other influential individuals begin linking terrorism to immigration, we are easily influenced to rally against immigration. Now, this is not to say that politicians are always trying to manipulate us, just that it's important to stay grounded in reason, and not let irrational fear override our decision making process.