tasha.elizarde
Jul 10, 2018

Families Belong Together, in Alaska and Elsewhere

2 comments

Last weekend, my hometown -- along with communities all across the U.S. -- hosted a rally in reaction to the "no tolerance" immigration policy imposed by ICE under the Trump Administration. Particularly, people were reacting to the 2,300 (recorded) children who were forcibly separated from their migrant parents since mid-2017. Personal conversations with a few of the Juneau rally participants highlighted the underlying message of the rally: that it is inhumane to keep children locked away from their parents.

 

The other key message I heard was to me, much more disconcerting. Many wondered, how could something this terrible happen here? In response, I like to point to history as our guide.

 

In Alaska and elsewhere, we have had and continue to have systems and policies put in place that -- whether intentionally or unintentionally -- oppress people of certain communities. If we're speaking generally of human rights violations, I'll bring up briefly the case of Filipino activist Jerome Aba, who this year claimed to be a victim of torture by the US Customs and Border Protection Agency (https://bit.ly/2Ja35bi). If we're speaking specifically about situations that parallel the problem at the center of the Families Belong Together movement, I'll bring up how for about 50 years the US Government separated Alaska Native children from their homes and put them through forced assimilation at boarding schools within the state (https://bit.ly/2uey1mn). While neither situation fully replicate the problem the "no tolerance" policy gave us, they all arise from a greater issue of immigration and race that our governing bodies continue to grapple with.

 

In both cases I mentioned before though, there have been people in formalized state and city leadership positions who've later condemned the acts that their place of assumed leadership committed. I'm proud to say that at Juneau and Anchorage's Families Belong Together rallies, our state leaders took ownership for the forced separation of Alaska Native families.

 

While I'm encouraged by this ownership, I won't ignore the fact that Alaska has had a greater role in inflicting racially-charged damage on the people of its state. Reflection on a single action is not enough. Reflection on the greater issue that has stemmed many of the same problems, though, is a more effective route that I implore everyone to embark on.

 

Thoughts?

Tuhin Chakraborty
Jul 10, 2018

Were these boarding schools that you mention permanently separating kids from their Alaskan families or was it temporary? Also, in the Alaska situation, the officials directly and aggressively came for innocent people already native to Alaska. Aren't immigrant families who come here against the law a different case scenario?

tasha.elizarde
Aug 26, 2018

Hey Tuhin! Firstly, if was temporary. Secondly, in comparing Alaska’s boarding schools with the situation at the border, they are different situations, but my point in comparing the two is that they’re both examples of the state willingly using family separation/trauma as a mechanism to get something the state wanted. I don’t think that whether a person is native or immigrating, that the state/governing body should be able to use excessive trauma as a tool of enforcement. I also want to highlight that the families who were separated in El Paso included asylum seekers, a legally accepted form of immigration, so the El Paso situation included both people that the state does and does not accept legally.

New Posts
  • tasha.elizarde
    Oct 24, 2018

    The gubernatorial race in Alaska is heating up. This November 6th, we will be deciding who will be our next Governor and Lt. Governor for the next term. Up until last week Wednesday, our race was a fight between three candidates: incumbent Governor Walker (I), former Alaska Senator Dunleavy (R), and former US Senator Begich. Governor Walker and former US Senator Begich had a near split vote, many people torn over who they should vote for. Governor Walker dropped the race though, leaving Walker supporters open to voting for Begich or Dunleavy. Not all voters will be able to vote in the different election, though. On the day Walker left the race, there were already about 1,000 absentee ballots received by the Division of Elections. That means that at least 1,000 people voted in an election thinking it would be a three-way race, not the two-way race it is now. Ultimately though, these votes can't be changed in this situation. What do you think — in the situation that a huge change in an election occurs, should we provide early voters with the opportunity to vote for someone else?
  • Felicity Wong
    Oct 17, 2018

    November is coming up, which means that the 2018 midterms for Congress (House and Senate) are nearing. Will the Democrats or Republicans take back/stay in control of the House? The Senate? Both? Why do you think so? What will be the impacts of the results? Here's an infographic/analysis created by Politico that is worth checking out if you're trying to follow the different blue and red candidates in the 2018 midterm elections across all 50 states: https://www.politico.com/election-results/2018/house-senate-race-ratings-and-predictions/
  • tasha.elizarde
    Oct 14, 2018

    The US isn't the first country you might think of when you think of the arctic, but thanks to Alaska, the US is a major stakeholder in Arctic issues. In fact, the USA is a permanent participant in the Arctic Council, the intergovernmental organization that coordinates action between arctic nations. What happens when we don't think of the US as part of the arctic? Most of the country is not in the arctic -- only the northernmost part of Alaska is inside the arctic circle -- but the implications of not considering the arctic in our governmental and corporate decisions are many. After all, problems that impact the arctic do not stay in the arctic, nor are they only applicable to the arctic. The hot ticket issue impacting the arctic is climate change, and the changing biodiversity in the arctic also impacts the biodiversity of everywhere else in the world too. The problems impacting the indigenous community are also uplifted in arctic forums, given that indigenous peoples are greatly intertwined with arctic issues. Decisions made at any level ultimately will impact the arctic in some way, so it is important that public officials understand how the arctic works in order to make effective decisions about it. Thoughts? Questions? Comments about the arctic?