Sofia Sears
Jul 3, 2017

Participating in Democracy Is More Than We Think


I recently came across an article in The New York Times while reading the paper this Sunday afternoon - print journalism is not dead and they gave us a 50% discount so albeit, they may be desperate - and the recognition of self within this article startled me. As an avid, passionate young activist, I find myself running right into one recurring problem. It isn't so much apathy or indifference to politics rather than a fundamental hesitancy to go beyond the most arbitrary and unfortunately, sometimes ineffectual, parts of political engagement. The article is worth chewing on- it is entitled "The Problem With Participatory Democracy Is the Participants," written by Eitan D. Hersh, and that title embodies the problem with contemporary activism.


There is a newfound, rapidly spreading and infectious piqued interest in political engagement, but the term "engagement" is generous. A lot of my peers and adults, as well, post their daily political opinions or repost articles on Facebook, sign a few petitions that often demand unrealistically lofty action, and that's about it. I know that everyone who does this has good intentions, but it is because of that that I feel it solicited to ask more of American than just that level of participation. We have to be better. We have to go further. How do we do that? We get involved locally. While it may sound less thrilling or important, it is actually perhaps the most invaluable type of involvement there is in this nation. Democracy doesn't function if it isn't happening successfully and passionately at the most basic of elections and levels. Doing this kind of work can be grueling, perhaps even uninspiring, and lack the instant gratification that online activism provides for us. When I say this, I do not mean to disparage the sheer brilliance and value of social media in activism and community organizing- it utterly reignited a universal passion for social justice- but I think of it as a gateway and vehicle to drive us directly to in-person change, too. As we can tell, voter turnout hasn't changed much even though we see how gruesomely low voter turnout can wreak havoc on our nation. We have to vote in local elections. We have to fight voter suppression and get more people out there, not just for the big elections, but for all of them. The midterms are coming up and it is absolutely essential that everyone who can vote does. No matter your ideological bend, midterms are ridiculously underestimated and also ridiculously important. This is a make or break midterm for some of us.


Politics needs to be more than a "leisure activity" or a "hobby," as Hersh puts it. I don't mean that everyone needs to quite their jobs and become professional politicians or activists for a living. I mean that when you do have the time, do it because you recognize that you have a civic duty to do so. Why are you posting that article on Facebook? Why are you calling your representatives every few months? What is the greater, larger picture here- what kind of America are you really fighting for? Voting needs to be a priority, not a hobby. It needs to be something made accessible to all and revered as the civic duty and powerful, autonomous vehicle of change that it really is. State-level participation is where change starts. Are you angry? Are you riled up, frustrated, discontent? Then get out there and flip a district. Get involved closer to home. The centralized base of power will never change if individual ones don't. A 50 state approach to political change is the only effective one.

Michael Martinez
Aug 28, 2017

Yes! Preach.

roman nordmun
Nov 9


Practicable INSTANT, Fulfilled Democracy EVERYWHERE, a HOW TO, (“Top 5” Preferential Primaries win with 73% in uber-polyglot, Global-University’d, World-Center NYC)

By their FRUITS you shall know them. Because it gives an equal chance of winning to ALL proposals, on a case by case basis, Ranked Ballot (voters ranking candidates in order of preference) will do wonders against Global Warming. By their FRUITS you shall know them. With all the many dangers we are faced with, & all the glorious opportunities coming our way, how could anyone not be ACTIVELY for Ranked Ballot. The 2016 win for Ranked Ballot (voters ranking candidates in order of preference) in Maine, USA will be truly transformative, & now, (“Eliminative” Preferential, aka INSTANT Run-off Voting or Ranked Choice Voting) "Top-5 Primaries" won with 73% in NYC this November. In each round of calculations, the loser is eliminated, but their supporters’ next choices are distributed among the remaining candidates. AND Ranked Ballot will be on the ballot for use in the GENERAL election in Massachusetts in 2020. The perfect compromise of win-win RB will more than answer all questions, in that it is the perfect marriage of Freedom with an eye for Justice & Justice with an eye for Freedom & gives an equal chance to ALL proposals on a case by case basis & to all VIEWPOINTS to sway the mass in their direction.

Ranked Ballot will give us not only a PERFECT MARRIAGE OF Freedom with an eye for Justice & Justice with an eye for Freedom, but also Woman & Man, Frugality & Liberality, Red, Brown, Black, Purple & Yellow, Tradition & Modernity, Young & Old, Rich & Poor, Left & Right, Self-interest & Idealism, City & Country, & Palestinian & Jew, Women’s Equal Representation, PRACTICABLE, Instant, FULFILLED Democracy EVERYWHERE, Creativity, Consistency & Direction, A Head for the Headless (Tech) Beast, an Ecological Politics & All Powers to their Lowest Appropriate Level.

New Posts
  • tasha.elizarde
    Oct 24, 2018

    The gubernatorial race in Alaska is heating up. This November 6th, we will be deciding who will be our next Governor and Lt. Governor for the next term. Up until last week Wednesday, our race was a fight between three candidates: incumbent Governor Walker (I), former Alaska Senator Dunleavy (R), and former US Senator Begich. Governor Walker and former US Senator Begich had a near split vote, many people torn over who they should vote for. Governor Walker dropped the race though, leaving Walker supporters open to voting for Begich or Dunleavy. Not all voters will be able to vote in the different election, though. On the day Walker left the race, there were already about 1,000 absentee ballots received by the Division of Elections. That means that at least 1,000 people voted in an election thinking it would be a three-way race, not the two-way race it is now. Ultimately though, these votes can't be changed in this situation. What do you think — in the situation that a huge change in an election occurs, should we provide early voters with the opportunity to vote for someone else?
  • Felicity Wong
    Oct 17, 2018

    November is coming up, which means that the 2018 midterms for Congress (House and Senate) are nearing. Will the Democrats or Republicans take back/stay in control of the House? The Senate? Both? Why do you think so? What will be the impacts of the results? Here's an infographic/analysis created by Politico that is worth checking out if you're trying to follow the different blue and red candidates in the 2018 midterm elections across all 50 states:
  • tasha.elizarde
    Oct 14, 2018

    The US isn't the first country you might think of when you think of the arctic, but thanks to Alaska, the US is a major stakeholder in Arctic issues. In fact, the USA is a permanent participant in the Arctic Council, the intergovernmental organization that coordinates action between arctic nations. What happens when we don't think of the US as part of the arctic? Most of the country is not in the arctic -- only the northernmost part of Alaska is inside the arctic circle -- but the implications of not considering the arctic in our governmental and corporate decisions are many. After all, problems that impact the arctic do not stay in the arctic, nor are they only applicable to the arctic. The hot ticket issue impacting the arctic is climate change, and the changing biodiversity in the arctic also impacts the biodiversity of everywhere else in the world too. The problems impacting the indigenous community are also uplifted in arctic forums, given that indigenous peoples are greatly intertwined with arctic issues. Decisions made at any level ultimately will impact the arctic in some way, so it is important that public officials understand how the arctic works in order to make effective decisions about it. Thoughts? Questions? Comments about the arctic?