Rachna Shah
Aug 14, 2017

Syrian Refugee Crisis, an op-ed


Jeffrey Che, an ambassador from Illinois, wrote an op-ed on the Syrian Refugee Crisis last December. We invite you to read it here - https://www.bridge-the-divide.com/single-post/2016/12/31/Syrian-Refugee-Crisis - and share your thoughts below!



"More than 250,000 Syrians have lost their lives in four-and-a-half years of armed conflict, which began with anti-government protests before escalating into a full-scale civil war. Some 11 million have been forced from their homes and 13.5 million are in need of dire humanitarian assistance as forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad and those opposed to his rule (including jihadist militants from the so called Islamic State) battle each other. As the conflict continues, a number of countries have opened their doors to refugees, though a select few are receiving the majority of them. Countries neighboring Syria are reaching a saturation point with regard to their abilities to absorb refugees. For example, the influx of refugees has increased Lebanon’s population by 25% and it now has the highest per capita number of refugees. Edward M. Gabriel, former U.S. Ambassador to Morocco and Vice Chairman of the American Task Force for Lebanon has said that this is a serious burden on Lebanon’s economy and Lebanon cannot afford to increase public debt.


The rapid influx of refugees has also put strains on nearly every part of the country: the economy, trade, public finance, health, education, safety, the labor market, infrastructure, traffic, and waste management. If the rest of the world can share in the burden of taking in refugees, then no single country would be unduly burdened, and both the host countries and the refugees would be better off. Germany, for example, started out with an open-doors policy towards refugees and has now found itself struggling to cope with the sheer volume. Helping citizens of another country in their time of need should not be a hard choice for Western countries, especially those with the resources and land to spare. However, many Western countries have chosen to stay on the sidelines, leading to the high concentration of refugees in a select few countries.


This inactivity in accepting refugees combined with a lack of a Western presence in Syria has caused many problems. Majed, a 26-year-old civil society activist has said that “the disappointment caused by the West’s inaction created a fertile recruiting ground for extremists, who told those who had lost their loved ones that they were their only hope.” Those who are in Syria are given only one option, the option of extremism. To some extent, because of the high concentration of refugees in a few countries, tensions are higher there than they should be and many are worried for their own well-being. In many ways, if the refugees were allowed to become more evenly dispersed across the world and if countries could become more accepting of refugees, tensions may be lowered, refugees may lead better lives, and host countries may benefit from a more diverse population."

Khushboo Shah
Aug 19, 2017

I extremely appreciate one point put forward in this OP-ED; and the point of how Syrian citizens are given only one option and that is "the option of extremism." Internal oppositions have been formed in Syria - and some of the strongest come from the Yazidi tribes, as their women take up arms to avenge the ISIS for their crimes against the Yazidi Women. And to take up arms is also one aspect of extremism; this article from January 2017, highlights one such case. https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-01-26/these-yazidi-sisters-took-arms-take-revenge-against-isis

Rachna Shah
Aug 19, 2017

Thank you for sharing that article, Khushboo. The fact that extremism is the only option for many Syrians is disheartening, even when the extremist groups themselves are fragmented and sometimes fighting against each other. Do you believe that there exists a way to combat extremism, both from the inside and from outside?

Valerie Wu
Aug 21, 2017

I really enjoyed this op-ed! I recently read a news article about how the government of Rome was restricting the number of refugees entering the country in order to "encourage" other countries to take charge of the Syrian Crisis--a philosophy that should logically make sense, but isn't practical for the situation. What are the policies that you think Western countries should adopt instead in this case?

New Posts
  • Levi Cannon
    Aug 15, 2018

    The Kurds are an ethic group living mostly in the mountainous regions of Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran. They are the 4th largest ethnic group in the Middle East with around 35 million people, but they still don't have a state. The Kurds have been fighting since the 1920s for their own state, and clashes have led to more instability in the Middle East. Kurdish militants have been among the rebels in the Syrian Civil War, and many believe that the Kurds are using the Civil War as an opportunity to get their own state. Should the Kurds get their own state, and what are the possible pros and cons?
  • Rachna Shah
    Nov 1, 2017

    What are your thoughts on this? http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-russia-oppositio/syrian-opposition-rejects-russia-sponsored-peace-initiative-idUSKBN1D13UU
  • Amal Zayani
    Mar 11, 2018

    What do you think about the US power's role in syria crisis, and what about the mistake that Clinton had committed in Iraq ! Do you think she repeated the same! And how do you find Trump's reproach to her about this ?