Alan Gao
Nov 30, 2017

Is Terrorism Worth It?

3 comments

Terrorism is a controversial issue that's dominated a large portion of the political discourse in the past few years. With breaking news flashes and horrifying pictures and stories of incidents of terrorist attacks, we often panic, fearing for the safety of ourselves and the people around us. The immediate panic that sets in after seeing a terrorist attack on television or on the news is known as the availability heuristic. Our brains are not inherently adept at probability, and therefore in these aforementioned instances, we overestimate our chances of being subject to a terrorist attack, when in reality, our real chances in an entire lifetime of being killed lie around 1 in 45,808 (http://www.businessinsider.com/death-risk-statistics-terrorism-disease-accidents-2017-1). That may seem fairly likely, but it pales in comparison to other causes of death, such as car, van, or truck incidents, which is 1 in 565. Since 9/11, the United States has spent over $1 trillion on anti-terrorism measures. These are all taxpayers dollars that come from the pockets of every American citizen. Does the threat of terrorism merit the enormous funds that the United States government allocates to it? What about the rest of the international community?

Tuhin Chakraborty
Dec 20, 2017

Would it be fair to say that the extensive financial measures taken by the US are the reason that the odds of terrorism are so low?

2
Alan Gao
Dec 29, 2017

While the financial measures taken by the US have certainly played a central role in diminishing threats of terrorism, an overwhelming portion of the nation's GDP has been allocated towards the military and similar ventures for the, "war against terror." Yes, substantial financial resources are required to combat terror threats, but the vast sum spent by the US is not the answer.

1
Rachna Shah
Dec 29, 2017

What would you recommend as a proper amount of spending?

0
New Posts
  • Aung Myo Htun ( Kelly)
    May 18, 2018

    Khmer Rouge Regime (1975-1979),Cambodia Khmer Genocide

    Pol Pot ■ He is a Khmer Nationalist, Cambodian revolutionary and politician who believes the theory of Moa ZeDone and Marxism, served as prime minister of Democratic Kampuchea from 1976-1979. ■ He is educated at Some of Cambodian’s elite schools, moved to Paris and also joined French Communist Party. ■ He and his army, called the Khmer Rouge, came to power in Cambodia in 1975. ■ He was named prime minister of the new communist government in 1976 and began a program of violet reform. ■ In hope of creating a society free of western influence, he abolished religion, institute, private property and evacuated cities. ■ Under his regime, forced labor, execution and famine killed ~2 million Cambodians. ■ The Khmer Genocide lasted 3 years-8 months-20 days Ironically, it was the Vietnamese who helped rid Cambodia of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge. ■ Aided by defectors from the Khmer Rouge's main government, Vietnam fought to gain control of Phnom Phenh and finally succeeded on January 7, 1979. ■ January7,1979PolPotfellandfledtoThaiborder Sharing Info via my paper May I intive to share us what you know about more.
  • Hasan Farooq
    Nov 14, 2018

    Who's the villain here ?

    Note : I'm not writing this to oppose or support any religion, race, country or any thing else. I just want you people to see reality.. because that's a harsh one. And we need to wake up now. We need to see everything ourselves instead of being fooled by the media or other sources. There are good people all around the globe. People don't hate anyone.We all need peace... Don't you ? Then, why is world going this way ? It has been years... Years of listening voices of fear and hopelessness Governments claiming that ISIS belongs to Muslims, and Muslims are behind everything happening right now. That's not the end. These differences range from religions to the color of a born baby. But let's just take a look at some figures. Total Muslims in the World : Around 1.8 Billion (1.8 x 1000 Millions !) Total ISIS in Numbers: Around 0.2 Million Take the ratio. Yes that's the reality ! So, first thing ( if you're good at numbers ) is ISIS doesn't represent Muslims. Now there's something even more shocking. Here's a chart that lists everything in detail. You'll see that the destruction by US, Russian and other forces combined is more than the destruction by ISIS. So, who's the one to blame here ? Is it only ISIS ? Or there's something else going on as well? Why the super powers of the time aren't able to fight with this small force ?? Explore more resources/facts..... Make you conclusion and share your thoughts .
  • annadomahidi
    Feb 21, 2018

    What do you count as terrorism?

    Terrorism is defined as inciting terror, however it has more recently come to be defined as "the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." (one of three Dictionary.com definitions vs. the Oxford Dictionary definition) This is sort of U.S. specific, but based on how you view/define terrorism, would you count last week's school shooting in Florida as an act of terrorism? It was the eighteenth school shooting in the United States this year and I've seen a lot of articles and social media posts debating whether or not it should be considered terrorism (and if whether or not that distinction is based on the race of the perpetrator, especially when covered by major media outlets). I personally am still debating this with myself and am not sure, but it's an interesting thought-- what do you guys think?